Every life matters. From the moment a new life begins, it’s unique, full of potential, and deserving of a chance. But too often, we don’t give the unborn that chance. We cut their journeys short before they even have a chance to begin.
Before I delve into the argument, please note that this isn’t about promoting any particular religion or personal beliefs. To be honest, you don’t need faith to recognize the simple, undeniable facts about human development. Life begins long before birth—and that’s a truth backed by science and human biology.
According to the CDC, around 96% of biologists agree that life begins at conception. That’s not a matter of opinion or belief; it’s a scientific consensus. When we talk about when life truly starts, we’re not debating philosophy or religion; we’re talking about biology.
Studies and research from scientists show that from the moment of conception, your genetic blueprint is already set. Your eye color, skin tone, hair color, and even your height are all determined right then. Essentially, who you are as a person is already written in your DNA.
To be honest, my take is simple about when life begins, but let’s address the arguments the pro-choice may give.
Some might argue that a baby shouldn’t be brought into a home where the parents can’t provide a good life. But here’s the thing: when we choose to be sexually active, we also choose to take on the responsibility that comes with it. Yes, condoms aren’t 100% effective—only about 80% of the time—but that doesn’t mean we should just ignore the consequences of our actions.
Just because a child might face hardship doesn’t mean we should end their life. It’s like saying every child born into a tough situation shouldn’t have a chance to live. That doesn’t make sense morally or logically.
One of the most difficult and emotional arguments is when it comes to cases of rape. I get that it’s hard to even imagine the trauma and pain a woman goes through in that situation. I’ve talked to women who’ve experienced rape. It’s hard, but here’s the thing: why should the unborn child pay the price for the father’s evil act? The baby had no part in that crime. If I could, I would be 100% in favor of the death penalty for the rapist, but the child, innocent and unknowing, doesn’t deserve to die.
Another point to consider: no one can tell who was conceived through rape. In fact, that’s proof that the unborn child, no matter how they came into the world, is still a human being with value. And if the mother doesn’t want to keep the baby, adoption is always an option. There are families who long to provide a loving home for children who need it.”
Arguing that only women can have a valid opinion on abortion or the value of life because they experience pregnancy is an unfair and limiting perspective. Sure, women go through unique experiences when it comes to pregnancy, but that doesn’t mean others can’t contribute meaningfully to the conversation. Using gender as a way to silence anyone who isn’t a woman doesn’t help move the dialogue forward—it just puts up walls. It disregards the fact that all of us, no matter our gender, share responsibility for the ethical issues surrounding life. We all have a role in shaping the values of our society, and by excluding certain voices, we lose the chance to have a more thoughtful, inclusive discussion about life and its worth.
