We have been led to believe for many years that we need to help minorities address so-called “discrimination” and systemic barriers they may confront. One such initiative has been affirmative action, put in place for many years to deal with these problems. But has it really worked? Many believe that affirmative action is an outdated policy—now an approach that, while sounding effective on paper, has failed to deliver the promised results of a better balance in society. Critics say affirmative action detracts from fairness by granting preference based on race rather than individual qualifications. They contend it can leave some applicants feeling they are being treated unfairly and breed perceptions of reverse discrimination—perceptions among people who believe they were passed over despite great credentials.

Proponents of reform argue that opportunities should be provided based on a person’s skill, merit, and experience, rather than their skin color. In this view, a system emphasizing the achievement of the individual, rather than the identity of the group, is the most coherent, durable, and fair method to guarantee opportunity for all.

As I see it, I believe people should be hired based on merit, skills, and qualifications. At the end of it all, it should be simple: let the best man get the job.”